Created: Jan 06, 2007
Updated: Jul 13, 2007
All Areas of Focus » Democracy and Voting »

Democratic Reform

Democratic Reform

Med_youth44
photo source
Democratic reform refers to the practice and process of lobbying and advocating for change in political systems to better reflect democratic values and to empower citizens to guide the governance of their region through participation. Democratic reform includes making a state hold regular elections, upholding the rule of law and having an independent judicial system.  Perfect Democracy is an ideal, and only through change and reform can a state's system become more democratic.

Keywords
electoral reform, transition to democracy, policy reform, independent judiciary, universal suffrage, civil society, democratic system reform, political funding, politics, fair representation, electoral corruption, campaign finance, pluralism, political accountability, authoritarian regimes, democratization, participatory democracy, autonomy, direct democracy, civil disobedience, direct action, democratic deficit

Featured Resources

Six Ways to Reform Democracy

Featured Organizations

Reclaim Democracy! is dedicated to restoring democratic authority over corporations, reviving grassroots democracy, and revoking the power of money and corporations to control government and civic society.

Agrupacion Politica Feminista works to promote the elaboration of new social pacts that foment the democratic exercise of power in the current transition towards democracy in Mexico. DiVersa proposes that the needs, concerns, and perspectives of all social groups be taken into consideration when forming these new social and political alliances.

Quote

Med_tv


"Democracy is being allowed to vote for the candidate you dislike least."

—Robert Byrne

Join the Discussion Forum to meet others interested in Democratic Reform.

Related WiserEarth Portals


Comments (1 - 1 of 1)

Login to Post a Comment.
Sm_avatar

Level Playing Fields

 

There is no such thing in life as a level playing field.  We are unequal individuals competing for our

slice-of-life with other individuals who may have more, less, or similar advantages and disadvantages.

Even individuals with similar circumstances may still have different opportunities presented to them,

which creates an advantage for one and not the other.  Perhaps a person has golden opportunities early

in life, but not later.  When government attempts intervention in this leveling process, it becomes a subject for public scrutiny at all levels of society.  How might this supervision escape common

criticisms and gain more widespread public and private approval? Methodology is the key to

acceptance, when coupled with a keen awareness of perception and historical perspective.

Judicial intervention risks initial charges of unfair advantage followed by countermeasures

intended to thwart end results. Framing the case properly results in beneficial guidelines

for future leveling measures.  Ultimately, society rises and falls based upon our

progression towards our ideals of justice and equality.

 

Mark O. Skilbred

1 to 1 of 1 Comments